Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
CPC 2025
CPC 2026
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Effectiveness of a Structured Multidisciplinary Team in Improving Outcomes in Infective Endocarditis
Session:
Sessão de Posters 24 - Endocardite infeciosa: estratificação de risco, tratamento e desfechos
Speaker:
Bárbara Antunes Rocha
Congress:
CPC 2026
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
16. Infective Endocarditis
Subtheme:
16.8 Infective Endocarditis - Other
Session Type:
Posters Eletrónicos
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Bárbara Antunes Rocha; João Faria; Carla Ferreira; Filipe Vilela; Mónica Dias; Sofia Fernandes; Inês Conde; Rita Marques; Luísa Graça; Juliana Martins; Alberto Salgado; Carlos Galvão Braga
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Introduction:</span></span></strong><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> Infective endocarditis (IE) carries substantial morbidity and mortality, and multidisciplinary care is recommended in contemporary guidelines. Endocarditis Teams aim to optimise diagnostic pathways, antimicrobial therapy, timing of surgery, and overall outcomes. A multidisciplinary Endocarditis Team composed of specialists in Cardiology, Internal Medicine, and Infectious Diseases was implemented in our centre. This study evaluated its impact on clinical management, complications, and mortality.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Methods:</span></span></strong><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adults diagnosed with IE between April 2021 and July 2025, with a minimum follow-up of three months. Patients were stratified into pre-team (n=52) and post-team (n=94) groups. Baseline characteristics, microbiology, imaging use, treatment pathways, and complications were compared. Mortality was assessed using chi-square analysis and multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, prosthetic valve, Staphylococcus aureus infection, and stroke. Risk ratios (RR) were also calculated.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Results:</span></span></strong><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> Baseline demographics and clinical features were similar between groups, with no significant differences in sex distribution, age, prosthetic valve prevalence, S. aureus infection (42.3% vs 23.4%, p=0.17), or surgical rates (40.4% vs 47.9%, p=0.393). Length of hospital stay, time to antibiotic initiation, duration of antibiotic therapy, time to advanced imaging, and time from surgical indication to operation showed no significant differences. Rates of cardiac, neurological, pulmonary, abdominal, limb, or other complications were also comparable (all p>0.05). However, mortality was significantly lower after the introduction of the multidisciplinary Endocarditis Team (chi-square p=0.002). In adjusted analysis, team implementation remained independently associated with reduced mortality (OR 0.393, 95% CI 0.181–0.853; p=0.018), corresponding to a relative risk reduction of approximately 60% (RR 0.328). IE recurrence remained infrequent and similar across groups (1.9% vs 5.3%, Fisher p=0.422).</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Conclusion:</span></span></strong><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> The introduction of a structured multidisciplinary Endocarditis Team was independently associated with a significant reduction in mortality. Given that baseline characteristics, microbiological patterns, complications, and management timelines were similar between groups, the mortality benefit is unlikely to reflect differences in case severity. Instead, it likely stems from improved diagnostic supervision, more systematic antimicrobial optimisation, and greater consistency with guideline-directed care. These findings support the routine integration of multidisciplinary teams as an effective strategy to improve outcomes in infective endocarditis.</span></span></span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site