Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
CPC 2025
CPC 2026
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Real-world performance of current sudden cardiac death risk models in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: a single-centre study
Session:
Sessão de Posters 18 - Miocardiopatia hipertrófica: genética, fenótipo e desfechos
Speaker:
Helena Santos Moreira
Congress:
CPC 2026
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
17. Myocardial Disease
Subtheme:
17.5 Myocardial Disease – Prevention
Session Type:
Posters Eletrónicos
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Helena Sofia Santos Moreira; Pedro Mangas Palma; Miguel Rocha; Catarina Marques; Mariana Vasconcelos; Elisabete Martins; Rui André Rodrigues; Ana Lebreiro
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Background: </span></strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains a cornerstone of disease management. However, currently available risk</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Cambria Math",serif">-</span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt">prediction tools require refinement to balance the risks and benefits of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Purpose: </span></strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt">To assess SCD risk and compare the performance of contemporary stratification strategies - namely the 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and 2024 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) flow-charts - in a real-world HCM population.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Methods: </span></strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Single-centre retrospective study of patients (pts) followed in a dedicated cardiomyopathy clinic with confirmed HCM. Pts with HCM mimics were excluded. Primary composite endpoint consisted of SCD, sustained ventricular arrhythmias and/or appropriate ICD therapies. Data was extracted from medical records.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Results: </span></strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt">A total of 130 HCM pts were included; 53.1% (n=69) were male, with mean age 62 ± 17 years. Obstructive phenotype was present in 22.3% (n=29), and pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified in 33.8% (n=44). Based on clinician judgement and guideline-based risk stratification, 17.7% (n=23) received an ICD, predominantly for primary prevention (n = 19, 82.6%). </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">At a median follow-up of 6 (IQR 8) years, 6 pts (4.6%) reached the primary endpoint – 5 pts due to appropriate ICD shocks (of which, 3 pts where ICD carriers in a primary prevention setting with an estimated HCM-SCD risk score > 6%) and 1 pt due to SCD. No inappropriate shocks in ICD-carriers were reported. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">When applied, the ESC 5-year HCM-SCD risk model was a significant predictor of events in Cox regression (HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.15–2.57; p = 0.009) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis yielded modest discrimination (AUC 0.623; 95% CI 0.309–0.937) – figure 1. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">In contrast, the ACC/AHA risk-marker–based algorithm did not differentiate event-free survival (log-rank p = 0.453), demonstrating limited discriminatory ability in our low-event-rate cohort.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Conclusions: </span></strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt">In our real-world HCM population, the ESC model demonstrated superior predictive performance and clinical utility compared with the ACC/AHA risk-marker approach, which was underpowered to detect differences in a population with predominantly low event rates. These findings underscore the need for improved and individualized SCD risk-prediction strategies in HCM.</span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site