Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
CPC 2025
CPC 2026
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Beyond the genotype in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: prevalence, phenotypic expression and disease-related outcomes
Session:
Sessão de Posters 18 - Miocardiopatia hipertrófica: genética, fenótipo e desfechos
Speaker:
Helena Santos Moreira
Congress:
CPC 2026
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
17. Myocardial Disease
Subtheme:
17.1 Myocardial Disease – Pathophysiology and Mechanisms
Session Type:
Posters Eletrónicos
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Helena Santos Moreira; Miguel Rocha; Pedro Mangas Palma; Catarina Marques; Mariana Vasconcelos; Elisabete Martins; Rui André Rodrigues; Ana Lebreiro
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">Background: </span></strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">Genetic testing plays a pivotal role in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) but its real-world clinical impact remains uncertain.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">Purpose: </span></strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">To characterize the genetic profile of a real-world HCM cohort and assess its correlation with phenotypic expression and disease-related outcomes (DRO).</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">Methods: </span></strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">Single-centre retrospective study of patients (pts) with confirmed HCM and prior genetic testing. Syndromic or infiltrative phenocopies were excluded. DRO included cardiovascular (CV) mortality, CV hospitalizations/urgent visits, device implantation and/or therapies, arrhythmias (ventricular arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation/flutter) and advanced heart failure. Data were obtained from medical record review.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">Results: </span></strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">101 pts were included, 55 male (54.5%), mean age 60±18 years. 29.7% had no identifiable genetic variants (n=30), 43.6% (n=44) carried pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants and 26.7% (n=27) had variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Among genotype-positive (GP) pts, sarcomere variants predominated (n=38, 86.4%), mostly involving β-myosin heavy chain - MYH7 (n=16, 36%) and cardiac myosin-binding protein C gene - MYBPC3 (n=8, 18.2%) genes.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">Although diagnosis was more common through routine/familial screening (58.4%), genotype-negative (GN) pts were diagnosed significantly later (52±18 vs 40±21 years; p<0.001) and due to symptoms (p=0.006). GP pts had more family history of HCM (47.8% vs 17.5%; p<0.001) but without differences in sudden death history. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">GN pts had a higher rates of arterial hypertension (51.9%, p<0.001), dyslipidemia (63%, p<0.001) and diabetes (22.2%, p=.019).</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">Asymmetric septal morphology was predominant (n=77, 76.2%), with similar maximal wall thickness (19 ± 4 mm; <em>p</em>=0.89). GN pts exhibited more left ventricle outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) (n=16, 28.1% in GN vs n=5, 11.6% in GP, p=0.046) and systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve/subvalvular apparatus (n=17, 29.8% in GN vs n=6, 14% in GP, p<0.050). LV ejection fraction (65 ± 5%; p=0.99) and diastolic parameters were similar. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">Cardiac MRI showed a higher proportion of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) >15% in GP pts (n= 23, 53.3% in GP vs n=14, 24.6% in GN, p=0.016) and broader intramyocardial LGE beyond septal segments (n=19, 54.3% in GP vs n=10, 20.8% in GN, p=0.017). </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">Biomarkers, namely NTpBNP (p=0.64) and hs-Troponin I (p=0.44), were comparable.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">After a median follow-up of 6 (IQR 9) years, no significant differences were observed in the composite endpoint of DRO (log-rank p=0.179) – figure 1.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif">Conclusions:</span></strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos Display",sans-serif"> In our real-world cohort, GP pts exhibited greater myocardial fibrosis, while GN pts showed a higher burden of later diagnosis and obstructive physiology. Despite these genotype–phenotype differences, DRO were similar, underscoring the limitations of current risk models and the need for deeper understanding and integration of genetic testing in HCM. </span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site