Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
CPC 2025
CPC 2026
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Prognostic Value of Right ventricular to Pulmonary Artery Coupling in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy
Session:
Sessão de Posters 52 - Função auricular, interação ventricular e fenotipagem miocárdica
Speaker:
Bárbara Lage Garcia
Congress:
CPC 2026
Topic:
B. Imaging
Theme:
03. Imaging
Subtheme:
03.1 Echocardiography
Session Type:
Posters Eletrónicos
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Bárbara Lage Garcia; Emídio Mata; Luísa Pinheiro; Margarida de Castro; Tamara Pereira; Filipa Cordeiro; Marina Fernandes; Lucy Calvo; Olga Azevedo; António Lourenço
Abstract
<p>Introduction: Right ventricular–pulmonary artery (RV-PA) uncoupling has emerged as an important prognostic marker in several cardiopulmonary diseases, but its relevance in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) remains underexplored. </p> <p>Aim: To determine whether RV-PA coupling indices - TAPSE/PASP (Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion/Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure), FAC/PASP (Fractional Area Change), and RVGLS/PASP (Right Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain) - predict a composite outcome of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) in patients with ATTR-CM. </p> <p>Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study including patients with confirmed ATTR-CM who underwent transthoracic echocardiography. RV-PA coupling was evaluated using TAPSE/PASP, FAC/PASP, and RVGLS/PASP. Non-coupled RV parameters were also assessed. Clinical follow-up included the composite of all-cause mortality and HFH. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent predictors. Prognostic performance was estimated with ROC curve analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed using the optimal ROC-derived cut-off values, and differences were evaluated using the log-rank test. </p> <p>Results: A total of 52 patients were included (mean age 82 years, 69% male). Among the parameters evaluated, FAC/PASP (HR 0.42 [0.17-0.998] p=0.049) and FAC (HR 0.97 [0.93-0.997] p=0.037) were the only independent predictors of the composite outcome. TAPSE/PASP (HR 0.19 [0.03-1.35] p=0.096), RVGLS/PASP (HR 0.15 [0.02-1.43] p=0.098), TAPSE (HR 0.94 [0.87-1.02] p=0.139), and RVGLS (HR 0.94 [0.88-1.02]p=0.139) were not statistically significant. </p> <p>At 1-year follow-up, ROC analysis showed: FAC/PASP area under the curve (AUC) of 0.654 [0.508-0.782], TAPSE/PASP AUC of 0.592 [0.447-0.726], and RVGLS/PASP AUC of 0.569 [0.424-0.706]. The optimal FAC/PASP cut-off was ≤0.6, with sensitivity of 39% and a specificity of 92%. Stratification using the ROC-derived FAC/PASP threshold of 0.6 %/mmHg identified patients with RV-PA uncoupling. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly higher event rates in patients below this threshold, confirmed by the log-rank test (p = 0.0002). </p> <p>Conclusion: In patients with cardiac amyloidosis, RV-PA uncoupling (particularly FAC/PASP) may be associated with adverse outcomes. More robust studies are needed to confirm FAC/PASP as a potential marker for risk stratification and help guide clinical decision-making in this population. </p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site