Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
CPC 2025
CPC 2026
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Prognostic value of early ScvO2 and pCO2 gap kinetics and normalization in patients with cardiogenic shock: a new management target?
Session:
Sessão de Comunicações Orais 04 – A bomba em falência: fronteiras hemodinâmicas e metabólicas na doença cardíaca crítica
Speaker:
Miguel Sobral Domingues
Congress:
CPC 2026
Topic:
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
Theme:
14. Acute Cardiac Care
Subtheme:
14.3 Acute Cardiac Care – CCU, Intensive, and Critical Cardiovascular Care
Session Type:
Comunicações Orais
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Miguel Sobral Domingues; Débora S. Correia; Ana R. Bello; Christopher Strong; João Presume; Jorge Ferreira; Catarina Brízido
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Introduction:</span></span></strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains associated with high short-term mortality despite advances in management. Traditional haemodynamic parameters are often insufficient to assess tissue perfusion and guide therapy. Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) and central venous–arterial pCO2 gap (pCO2 gap) are potential bedside surrogates of perfusion, yet their prognostic value and dynamic behaviour in CS are not fully established.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Purpose:</span></span></strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> To evaluate the prognostic impact of early ScvO2 and pCO2 gap normalization in patients admitted with CS.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Methods:</span></span></strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> We conducted a single-centre retrospective study on consecutive patients admitted to CICU with CS between 2015 and 2025. Patients with both baseline and 24 to 48h follow-up measurements of ScvO2 and/or pCO2 gap were analysed. Normalization thresholds up to 48h were defined as ScvO2 > 60% and pCO2 gap < 6 mmHg. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality or advanced heart-failure therapy (heart transplantation or LVAD). Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan–Meier estimates, and prognostic factors evaluated through univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. A discriminative analysis was also performed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Results:</span></span></strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> Among 446 patients with CS, 92 had paired ScvO2 measurements, and 79 had paired pCO2 gap measurements. Mean age was 67±17 years; 32% women<span style="color:black">.</span> Regarding the CS aetiology, 159 (55%) presented with AMI-CS, 63 (23%) with HF-CS, and 58 (21%) with secondary-CS. Median ScvO2 and pCO2 gap were 58% [46-68] and 9 mmHg [7-12] at admission, and 60% [53-68] and 7 mmHg [5-9] at re-evaluation. Across patients with paired ScvO2 and pCO2 gap measurements available, 46 (50%) had ScvO2 normalized and 30 (38%) had pCO2 gap normalized at 48h. Normalization of ScvO2, but not pCO2 gap, within 48 hours was significantly associated with a lower incidence of the primary endpoint (log-rank p < 0.001 and 0.090, respectively). In multivariate analysis, normalization of ScvO2 (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.70, p=0.003), but not pCO2 gap (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.39-1.49, p=0.43), remained an independent predictor of the primary outcome after adjustment for age, sex, SCAI stage at admission, occurrence of cardiac arrest, and baseline lactate level. The area under the curve (AUC) for ScvO2 value on re-evaluation over the first 48h was moderate but statistically significant (AUC = 0.66 [0.56–0.77], p=0.002) whereas the AUC for pCO2 gap did not reach statistical significance.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Conclusions:</span></span></strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> In patients with CS, early ScvO2 normalization within the first 48 hours of intensive care was independently associated with improved short-term outcomes. In contrast, correction of the pCO2 gap did not demonstrate a significant prognostic impact in this cohort. These findings suggest that ScvO2 may serve as valuable, non-invasive tool for risk stratification and treatment guidance in acute cardiac critical care.</span></span></span></span></p>
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site