Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
CPC 2025
CPC 2026
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Prognostic value of right ventricular systolic function markers in ATTR-CM
Session:
Sessão de Comunicações Orais 10 – Estratificação de risco guiada por imagem em situações cardíacas complexas
Speaker:
Andre Moniz Garcia
Congress:
CPC 2026
Topic:
B. Imaging
Theme:
03. Imaging
Subtheme:
03.1 Echocardiography
Session Type:
Comunicações Orais
FP Number:
---
Authors:
André Moniz Garcia; Miguel Domingues; Rita Carvalho; Sergio Maltês; Tânia Laranjeira; Carlos Aguiar; Marisa Trabulo4; Regina Ribeiras; Bruno M. Rocha
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Introduction:</span></strong><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is a well-established prognostic factor in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM). Amyloid deposition in ATTR-CM often leads to biventricular thickening and dysfunction, which may reflect amyloid burden. The clinical significance of right ventricular (RV) function, however, is not clearly defined. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Aims:</span></strong><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> To evaluate the added prognostic value of RV function in ATTR-CM.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Methods: </span></strong><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Single-centre retrospective study including all consecutive patients with heart failure (HF) due to ATTR-CM followed from 2019 to 2025. ATTR-CM was diagnosed as per the recommended multi-step algorithm. Echocardiographic parameters were obtained from the first available transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) performed at our institution. We proceeded with RV function analysis as per the EACVI/ASE recommendations. Fractional area change (FAC), was obtained in 2D ecochardiogram and easily executed. The primary endpoint was all-cause death. Survival analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Results:</span></strong><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> Among 286 patients with ATTR-CM, 214 were identified to have a baseline TTE with RV-measurable functional data (mean age 85 ± 6 years, 81% male, 71% tafamidis). RV assessment showed a mean FAC of 34.6 ± 9.4% and free wall longitudinal strain (RV-FWLS) of -17.0 ± 5.2%. Median tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) was 17 (13-19) mm and mean RV S’ (RVS) wave was 10 (8-13) cm/s. Among markers of RV systolic function, univariate analysis showed that FAC and FWLS were the only RV-related independent predictors. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">After a median follow-up of 1.8 (1.0–2.9) years, the primary endpoint was reached in 62 patients <u><span style="color:#65b4b4">(</span></u>29.0%). In multivariate analysis – adjusted for NYHA, LV ejection fraction, NT-proBNP, creatinine, RV-FWLS and tafamidis– FAC remained as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality, while RV-FWLS did not. ROC curve analysis showed the optimal cut-off value for FAC <31% (present in 67% of the patients),<u><span style="color:#65b4b4"> </span></u>with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.729 (sensitivity 59% , specificity 81%). In a new multivariate model adjusted for the same variables<u><span style="color:#65b4b4">,</span></u> FAC <31% independently predicted the primary outcome with an HR 2.08 (95% CI 1.02-4.35; p=0.027). </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Conclusion</span></strong><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">: In this ATTR-CM cohort, FAC provided independent prognostic information beyond well-established clinical, biomarkers, and echocardiographic parameters. A FAC < 31% was associated with a substantially higher risk of death — more than doubling the risk — highlighting its potential value for risk stratification.</span></span></span></p>
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site