Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
CPC 2025
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Risk Stratification in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: The Role of T1/T2 Mapping and Extracellular Volume
Session:
SESSÃO DE POSTERS 48 - RESSINCRONIZAÇÃO CARDÍACA E CDI
Speaker:
Inês Amorim Cruz
Congress:
CPC 2025
Topic:
D. Heart Failure
Theme:
10. Chronic Heart Failure
Subtheme:
10.2 Chronic Heart Failure – Epidemiology, Prognosis, Outcome
Session Type:
Cartazes
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Inês Amorim Cruz; Simão Carvalho; Carlos Costa; Tiago Aguiar; Ana Catarina Faustino; Luís Miguel Santos; Ana Briosa
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><em><u><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Background:</span></span></u></em> <span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) is an increasingly recognized cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite this, accurate risk stratification of NIDCM remains challenging. Recent studies showed that the presence and extent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. However, the prognostic value of T1, T2 mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) is less explored.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><em><u><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Aim:</span></span></u></em><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> To explore the predictive value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) findings - T1, T2 mapping and ECV - for heart failure (HF)-related events in NIDCM patients.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><em><u><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Methods:</span></span></u></em><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> Between February 2022 and October 2024, patients diagnosed with NIDCM who underwent CMR at our center were included. All CMR images were acquired using a 1.5-T scanner (Magnetom Sola, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). T1 mapping was quantified within the septal myocardium in areas without LGE enhancement (T1 native) and ECV was calculated using pre, post-contrast T1 and </span></span><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">synthetic </span></span><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">haematocrit. The primary endpoint was HF hospitalization.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><em><u><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Results:</span></span></u></em><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> Among the 53 patients with NIDCM, 40% were women, with a median age of 64 years [IQR 52-69], 55% were in NYHA 2 or higher, 15% had an implantable device and the median LV ejection fraction was 40% [IQR 30-47]. During a median follow-up of 13 months [IQR 5-22], only 6 patients (11%) had a HF hospitalization. Apart from the NT-proBNP value (3578 [IQR 3203-3959], p=0.008), these patients were similar compared with patients with no HF hospitalization. T1 mapping and ECV was similar between NYHA class (p=0.21 and p=0.33, respectively) and both were correlated with LV ejection fraction (r = -0.46, p=<0.001 and r = -0.44, p=0.001, respectively). In univariable Cox regression analysis, although T1 mapping (HR=1.01, [95% CI, 0.99-1.02], p=0.3) and T2 mapping (HR=1.01, [95% CI, 0.83-1.23], p=>0.9) were not associated with higher risk of HF hospitalization, patients with higher ECV had higher risk of HF hospitalization (HR=1.11, [95% CI, 1.01-1.22], p=0.03, Table 1). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, including age, gender and LV ejection fraction, ECV remain an independent predictor of HF hospitalization (HR=1.13, [95% CI, 1.00-1.28], p=0.046, Table 1).</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><em><u><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Conclusion:</span></span></u></em><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> In this cohort of patients diagnosed with NIDCM, extracellular volume was an independent predictor of HF hospitalization, suggesting its usefulness as a potential non-invasive marker for risk stratification in these patients.</span></span></span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site