Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
CPC 2025
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Unveiling the Population Dynamics of Sepsis Cardiomyopathy: A Comprehensive Evaluation
Session:
SESSÃO DE POSTERS 33 - DOENÇAS CARDIOVASCULARES - MINOCA E SÍNDROME DE TAKOTSUBO
Speaker:
Inês Caldeira Araújo
Congress:
CPC 2025
Topic:
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
Theme:
14. Acute Cardiac Care
Subtheme:
14.3 Acute Cardiac Care – CCU, Intensive, and Critical Cardiovascular Care
Session Type:
Cartazes
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Inês Caldeira Araújo; Ana Abrantes; Catarina Gregório; Miguel Azaredo Raposo; João Fonseca; Marta Vilela; Daniel Cazeiro; Diogo Ferreira; João Cravo; Sofia Esteves; F. J. Pinto; Doroteia Silva
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Introduction: </strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">Sepsis cardiomyopathy (SC) is a condition marked by ventricular dilation, reduced ejection fraction (EF) and normal filling pressures, typically resolving within 7–10 days in septic patients. Despite its clinical importance, SC is poorly understood, with limited research and an unclear prognosis.</span></span></span></p> <p> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Purpose:</strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"> This study aims to characterize patients diagnosed with SC between 2022 and 2023 and compare their clinical profiles and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) outcomes with those of patients without SC (noSC).</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"> </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Methods: </strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">Retrospective, observational, single-center study of consecutive patients with SC diagnosis, between January 2022 and December 2023. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"> </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Results: </strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">306 patients were included, 19% with SC and 81% without SC. Cardiovascular comorbidities and previous structural heart disease were comparable between groups (SC: 20.4% vs. noSC: 22.2%). Median ICU length of stay did not differ significantly between the two groups (SC: 4 vs. noSC: 5 days). However, in-hospital cardiac arrest occurred more frequently in SC patients (20.7% vs. 8.1%; p=0.005). ICU mortality was significantly higher in the SC group (55.2% vs. 39.3%; p=0.027), although overall in-hospital mortality showed no significant difference (SC: 56.9% vs. noSC: 52%). Infection source control and time to effective source control were similar between the two groups. Regarding end-organ dysfunction, SC patients exhibited higher rates of encephalopathy (56% vs. 36.6%; p=0.014), hepatocellular injury (78% vs. 57.7%; p=0.009), and renal dysfunction (6.9% vs. 9.9%; p=0.017). Analogously, inotrope and vasopressor use was higher in SC patients, being noradrenaline and dobutamine the most used drugs (peak noradrenaline dose 165 mcg/min in SC vs 80 mcg/min, peak dobutamine 5 mcg/Kg/min in both groups). Mean SvO2 at admission was significantly lower in SC patients (63.3% vs. 69.6%; p=0.010), while peak lactate levels were significantly higher (SC: 64 mg/dL vs. noSC: 46 mg/dL; p=0.011). Patients in both groups had similar CRP peak (26.1 mg/dL in both groups), but SC patients had higher peak troponin T (SC: 62 ng/L vs. noSC: 49 ng/L, p value 0.070) and NTproBNP levels (SC: 15434 pg/mL vs noSC: 4887 pg/mL, p value 0.004). </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Conclusions: </strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">SC worsens septic patient outcomes by impairing hemodynamic stability and organ dysfunction, emphasizing the need for early detection and treatment.</span></span></span></p> <p> </p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site