Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
CPC 2025
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Incremental prognostic value of CT-derived extracellular volume in severe aortic stenosis
Session:
SESSÃO DE COMUNICAÇÕES ORAIS 14 - PRÉMIO JOVEM INVESTIGADOR (CLÍNICA E BÁSICA)
Speaker:
Rita Almeida Carvalho
Congress:
CPC 2025
Topic:
B. Imaging
Theme:
03. Imaging
Subtheme:
03.2 Computed Tomography
Session Type:
Comunicações Orais
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Rita Almeida Carvalho; Márcia Presume; Rita Reis Santos; Francisco Albuquerque; Pedro Lopes; Francisco Gama; Cláudia Silva; Pedro Freitas; Sara Guerreiro; João Abecasis; Rui Campante Teles; António Ferreira
Abstract
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong>Background</strong>: </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif">Severe aortic stenosis (AS) has a poor prognosis without timely intervention. While risk stratification is primarily guided by clinical scores, myocardial extracellular volume estimation using cardiac computed tomography (ECV-CT), a marker of fibrosis, has emerged as a promising prognostic tool. This study sought to determine if ECV-CT can provide independent and incremental prognostic information to established clinical risk markers. </span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong>Methods</strong>:</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif">This prospective single-center study included consecutive patients with severe symptomatic AS undergoing pre-TAVR (transcatheter aortic valve replacement) CT. Patients with prosthetic aortic valves or known cardiac amyloidosis were excluded. Imaging was performed using a 192-slice dual-source CT scanner, with ECV-CT obtained via an additional post-contrast, low-radiation-dose, prospective acquisition (Figure 1A). ECV-CT values were compared with two risk scores: EuroSCORE II and PRIORiTize-TAVI. The composite endpoint was time to all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong>Results</strong>:</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif">A total of 316 patients (mean age 81 ± 8 years; 44% male; mean transaortic gradient 50 ± 15 mmHg; mean aortic valve area 0.74 ± 0.19 cm²; mean left ventricular ejection fraction 56 ± 11%) were analyzed. The median ECV-CT was 33.9% (IQR 29.5-38.7). Over a median follow-up of 340 days (IQR 198–517), the composite endpoint occurred in 72 patients (23%), including 47 deaths (15%) and 25 cardiovascular hospitalizations (8%). Patients reaching the endpoint were older (84 ± 8 vs. 80 ± 8 years, p=0.012), had lower LV ejection fraction (51 ± 13 vs. 57 ± 10%, p<0.001), higher NT-proBNP levels (4002 pg/mL (IQR 929-8678) vs. 838 (IQR 377-2126), p<0.001), and higher scores on both EuroSCORE II (6.32 ± 5.12 vs. 4.05 ± 3.23%, p=0.002) and PRIORiTize (4.4 ± 1.6 vs. 3.3 ± 1.3, p=0.008). These patients also had higher median ECV-CT values (39.8% (IQR 33.5-44.2) vs. 32.9% (IQR 29.5-38.3), p=0.001). </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif">Decision tree analysis identified an ECV-CT value ≥40.2% as the best threshold for predicting outcomes (Figure 1B). Patients with ECV-CT ≥40.2% (n=53) accounted for 17% of the study population but were responsible for 29% of all events. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif">Multivariate Cox regression showed that logECV-CT remained an independent predictor of the composite endpoint after adjusting for EuroSCORE II (HR 4.2, 95%CI 1.3-13.9, p=0.016) and PRIORiTize (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.3-11.6, p=0.012). Finally, nested regression models of the global Chi-square value of the likelihood ratio test demonstrated that incorporating logECV-CT significantly improved the predictive performance of both EuroSCORE II and PRIORiTize (Figure 1C). </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><strong>Conclusion</strong>: </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif">CT-derived ECV provides incremental prognostic value beyond clinical scoring systems in patients with severe AS, aiding in identifying higher-risk patients. The potential role of this marker for clinical decision-making warrants further investigation. </span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site